teriop.blogg.se

1. #Android terminal emulator operation not permitted spoof mac how to
2. #Android terminal emulator operation not permitted spoof mac android

3) Do you have any suggestions of "competitors" for SSHelper which may provide some of the functionality in a different way? I would have suggested Termux, a better and much more complete environment than SSHelper, with many more details fully fleshed out like a package manager - but all are going away now.

#Android terminal emulator operation not permitted spoof mac android

non-Java) projects, written to accommodate multiple platforms and word sizes, plus front-end Java code suitable for a mainstream Android application that calls the binaries to do the heavy lifting.

#Android terminal emulator operation not permitted spoof mac how to

2) If you have any documentation about how to rebuild the package from the source tarball that you've provided (that is not already in the tarball), could you post that, too? (I've never built an apk) My application is open-source, but it's not that simple - SSHelper isn't just an APK compilation. Simply put, these changes destroy my application's ability to function, and that of Termux as well. The linked article - and others - explain that in Android 10+, (a) executable binaries can no longer reside in a read/write directory, and (b) access to /sdcard will go away. I should add that Termux is basically saying the same thing I am - they see this as the end of their current operational model as well, and who are also giving up. So a move away from an open environment is inevitable. Google also has to compete with Apple's iOS platform, which seems much more secure. They need to tighten up security to stay ahead of the black-hats who see Android as a way to access the mobile resources of Android's users - personal information, bank accounts, and so forth - users who aren't necessarily technical but who have valuable resources located on their devices and who rely on the security and integrity of this mobile platform. I plan to say I understand and appreciate Google's position. If I may impose, perhaps one last time, on behalf of all SSHelper users (when you get a chance, obviously):ġ) Can you move your "final message" to the top of the page to make it more visible? I'm planning that.

I have successfully reinstalled your version 130 and it's working again. I can only imagine the frustration you must be feeling! Yes, it's frustrating, but I understand where Google is coming from, and their priorities. Paul: I just read your main page, at the bottom, where you announce the final version of SSHelper.